Back
SHAMIM AHMED
Raj Kumar Saroj – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A.-I for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The instant petition under Article 227 of The Constitution of India has been filed with following relief:-
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 23.05.2015, police of Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda recovered a Truck bearing Registration No. UP-32-A-9016 and an F.I.R. was lodged as Case Crime No. Nil/2015, under Sections 41, 411, 413, 420, 467, 468, 487 I.P.C. at Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda, which was later on converted to Case Crime No.0999/2015.
4. He further submits that thereafter the matter was investigated by the Investigating Officer and charge sheet was submitted before the learned court below. He further submits that during trial on 23.08.2023, the court of learned Additional District and S
The court emphasized that the procedure for proceeding against a police officer under Section 29 of the Police Act must be in conformity with the provisions of the Act and related regulations, and th....
A Magistrate must not express views on the merits of a case when directing an investigation under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C., as it may compromise the integrity of the investigation.
The importance of providing a fair opportunity of hearing before reaching a decision in disciplinary proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
