Vikas Verma vs State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 97

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Vikas Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Rakesh Kumar Agarwal, Saksham Agarwal
For the Opposite Party : Girish Kumar Pande, Prashant Pandey

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Saksham Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aniruddh Kumar Singh, learned AGA-I for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that the learned counsels for the private opposite party have informed the learned counsel for the petitioner in writing that they shall not be appearing in the present case on behalf of the private opposite party.

3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following reliefs:-

"The applicant most humbly and respectfully beg to submit that on the basis of facts mentioned in the accompanying affidavit this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the charge-sheet dated 14.02.2021, summoning order dated 04.03.2021 passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate Lucknow and also the order dated 27.04.2023 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge-4 (Prevention of Corruption Act) Lucknow whereby charge had been framed under Section 498(A)/304(B)/302 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 (the certified copy of the charge-sheet dated 14.02.2021, summoning order dated 04.03.2021 and order dated 27.04.2023 is contained in ANNEXURE-1, 2 & 3 respectively) or to pass any other order