JUDGMENT :

(1). Heard Shri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

(2). At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to inadvertent the challenge to the impugned orders could not be incorporated in the prayer clause and consequently, prays that he may be permitted to assail the validity of the impugned orders dated 06.09.2007 passed by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh under Section 17 (3) (b) of the Arms Act and dated 21.11.2007 passed by learned Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad.

(3). Learned Standing Counsel for the State did not object the same.

(4). Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to incorporate necessary amendment in the prayer clause during the course of the day.

(5). By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 06.09.2007 passed by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh under Section 17 (3) (b) of the Arms Act and also order dated 21.11.2007 passed by learned Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad.

(6). It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner moved an a