SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 165

M.KATJU
GANESH CHANDRA BHATT – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ALMORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Namrata Singh

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed with a prayer for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners application for grant of a license for a Revolver, and to issue him the said license under the Arms Act, 1959. On 17-2-1993, I had granted three weeks time to the Learned Standing Counsel for filing counter affidavit but as yet no counter affidavit has been filed. Hence I am treating the allegations in the petition to be correct and am disposing of the petition finally.

( 2 ) I have heard Shri Namwar Singh, Learned counsel for the petitioner, and Learned Standing Counsel.

( 3 ) THE petitioner applied for a license for a Revolver on 27-6-1990 for his personal security as well as security of his property. A true copy of the said application is Annexure-1 to the petition. The petitioner has stated that he is a peace loving citizen with good antecedents, and he has never been involved in any offence. He owns a bus under a valid permit, a factory, and landed property. He claims that he needs the Revolver for the security of his life and property. In para-3 of the petition, it has been stated that the District Magistrate called for a report from the autho

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top