NEERAJ TIWARI
Ganga Sharan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Pawan Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.
2. Present petition has been filed with following prayer;
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted petitioner has filed representation dated 09.10.2023, under Section 76(3) of U.P. Revenue Code before Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kol District Aligarh-respondent no. 2, but till date, same has not been decided. He next submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the same at the earliest for which, learned standing counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 4 has no objection.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 09.10.2023 strictly in accordance with l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.