IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, JJ.
AB(2022) - Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ C. No. 16354 Of 2022
Decided On : 08-06-2022
PREGNANCY - MINOR - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5-A - The court allowed the termination of pregnancy of a minor rape victim after considering the medical board's report, which indicated a risk to the petitioner's life and grave injury to her physical and mental health. The court relied on the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the legal presumption created by the first explanation to sub-section 2 of Section 3, which considers pregnancy resulting from rape as a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a minor rape victim, sought permission to terminate her pregnancy due to the risk it posed to her life and grave injury to her physical and mental health.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the termination of the pregnancy based on the medical board's report, which indicated the risk to the petitioner's life and grave injury to her physical and mental health.
Issues: Permission for termination of pregnancy for a minor rape victim, interpretation of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the legal presumption created by the first explanation to sub-section 2 of Section 3, which considers pregnancy resulting from rape as a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Final Decision: The court permitted the termination of the pregnancy, directing it to be carried out at a recognized medical center before the fetus attains the age of 24 weeks.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Subhash Rathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and perused the record.
2. The instant petition has been filed by a minor through her father and natural guardian praying for a mandamus directing the State respondents to permit the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy.
3. The facts of the case are extracted in our previous order dated 03.06.2022 and the same is reproduced below:-
The instant petition has been filed by a minor through her father and natural guardian praying for a mandamus directing the respondents to permit her to terminate her pregnancy.
As per High School Examination Marks Sheet-cum-Certificate dated 27.06.2020, the date of birth of the petitioner is 3.1.2005. She is therefore still a minor having not attained majority under the provisions of Indian Majority Act, 1875 whereunder the age is 18 years. The petitioner is alleged to be a rape victim. A first information report was lodged by her father on 10.4.2022 in relation to the incident dt. 3.3.2022 registered as Case Crime No.0089 of 2022. Initially the first information report was registered under Section 363 IPC but during course of investigation, Section 376 IPC and 3/4 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 have been added. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Explanation I of sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in contending that the pregnancy has resulted in great anguish to the petitioner and the entire family. It is submitted that continuance of pregnancy would risk the life of the petitioner as well as her physical and mental well being. He has also placed reliance on Explanation II whereunder in a case of rape, anguish caused by pregnancy, is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
As per sonography report, the pregnancy was of sixteen weeks five days on 21.4.2022 and is thus now of twenty two weeks five days (+ -1 day). As the pregnancy does not exceed twenty four weeks, it could be terminated as per Section 3 of the Act.
It is pertinent to note that under Section 3 it is permissible to allow a pregnant woman to terminate pregnancy if its continuance involves a risk to her life or grave injury to her physical or mental health. Under Explanation I, the Court is empowered to presume that such a pregnancy constitutes a grave injury to mental health of the pregnant woman. Under sub-section (4) of Section 3 in case of a minor the pregnancy could be terminated with the consent in writing of her guardian. Section 3 (2C) mandates that every State Government or Union Territory by notification in Official Gazette, shall constitute a Board to be called a Medical Board for the purposes of this Act. It should consist of a Gynaecologist, a Paediatrician, a Radiologist or Sonologist and such other number of members as may be notified in the Official Gazette by the State Government or Union Territory, as the case may be. Sri Mohan Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel has received instructions from the Chief Medical Officer, Allahabad that so far the State Government has not notified constitution of the Medical Board.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner is a resident of district Baghpat, therefore, it would be convenient for her to get her pregnancy terminated at Lala Lajpat Rai Medical College, Meerut.
Accordingly, we direct the Principal, Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial Medical College, Meerut to constitute a Board of four experts one each in the field of Gynecology, Psychiatry, Radiology or Sonology and Pediatrics.
The first Additional District Judge, Meerut shall act as a member cum co-ordinator of t
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the legal presumption regarding pregnancy resulting from rape, as well as the best interest....
Termination of unwanted pregnancy - Petitioner being a minor, 'substituted judgment' test would apply - Petitioner who is only sixteen years of age, does not want to continue with her pregnancy.
Pregnancy shall be terminated by a registered medical practitioner at a hospital established or maintained by Government or a place for the time being approved for the purpose of this Act by Governme....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the consideration of the physical and mental health risks to the pregnant....
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
The Court reiterated that the rights of minor victims of sexual assault must be balanced with welfare considerations in matters of pregnancy termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act....
A minor rape survivor's mental health is a critical consideration in granting permission for medical termination of pregnancy beyond statutory limits.
Termination of 28-week high-risk pregnancy of minor victim permitted beyond statutory limit, safeguarding physical/mental health and right to dignity under Article 21 based on Medical Board opinion.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking terminati....
The judgment establishes the right of a rape victim to terminate pregnancy based on the risk to her life and mental health, as provided in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.