SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
AB(2022) – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anurag Yadav, Mahendra Pratap.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Subhash Rathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and perused the record.

2. The instant petition has been filed by a minor through her father and natural guardian praying for a mandamus directing the State respondents to permit the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy.

3. The facts of the case are extracted in our previous order dated 03.06.2022 and the same is reproduced below:-

    "Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mohan Srivastava assisted by Sri Hari Keshav for the State-respondents and perused the record.

The instant petition has been filed by a minor through her father and natural guardian praying for a mandamus directing the respondents to permit her to terminate her pregnancy.

As per High School Examination Marks Sheet-cum-Certificate dated 27.06.2020, the date of birth of the petitioner is 3.1.2005. She is therefore still a minor having not attained majority under the provisions of Indian Majority Act, 1875 whereunder the age is 18 years. The petitioner is alleged to be a rape victim. A first information report was lodged by her father on 10.4.2022 in rela

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top