IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
‘X’ – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1194 of 2022
Decided on : 22-06-2022
Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Minor Girl - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971, Section 3
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a minor girl, sought a direction to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as she was a victim of alleged rape and sexual abuse. The petitioner's pregnancy was 8 weeks and 5 days long, and she sought termination within the permissible period of 20 weeks.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioner to be examined by a Medical Board to assess her mental/physical health and the length of her pregnancy. If the Medical Board opined that termination was in the petitioner's best interest to prevent injury to her mental health, the Chief Medical Officer was to make necessary arrangements for termination. The court also directed the collection of tissue and blood samples for DNA and other tests, and provided for medical/health support for the petitioner for three weeks after the procedure.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a minor victim of rape, should be allowed to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the provisions of Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, which allows termination of pregnancy up to 20 weeks and up to 24 weeks in certain cases. The court also relied on Explanation 2 to Section 3(2), which presumes that pregnancy caused by rape constitutes a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with directions for the petitioner's examination by a Medical Board, assessment of her mental/physical health, and termination of pregnancy if deemed in her best interest to prevent injury to her mental health.
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner is a minor girl, who was born on 27.09.2005, as per her date of birth recorded in High School Certificate. She is a victim of alleged rape and sexual abuse. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to respondents to terminate her pregnancy, as per provisions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
3. It is stated in the writ petition that she had made application to the Investigating Officer in respect of F.I.R. No. 188 of 2022 (registered on 25.05.2022 in P.S. Transit Camp, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar) seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy. She had made similar request to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar on 10.06.2022 by making an application, which is on record as Annexure-6 to the writ petition.
4. The relief sought in the writ petition is extracted below:-
5. Since petitioner is a minor, therefore, this writ petition has been filed through her mother/natural guardian.
6. The ultrasonography report dated 02.06.2022 is on record as Annexure-3 to the writ petition, which reveals that length of pregnancy is 8 weeks 5 days. Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as amended in 2021 is reproduced below:-
[(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,—
(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or
(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the opinion, formed in good faith, that—
(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or
(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of clause (a), where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish caused by such pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Explanation 2.—For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
(2-A) The norms for the registered medical practitioner whose opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act.
(2-B) The provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pr
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking terminati....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the mental and physical well-being of the victim in allowing the termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory limit.
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the consideration of the physical and mental health risks to the pregnant....
The court established that minors can terminate pregnancies resulting from sexual abuse with guardian consent, prioritizing mental health considerations.
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, specifically Section 3(2)(b), which allows termination of pregnancy if it poses a risk to the woman's....
The court allowed the termination of a minor's pregnancy resulting from rape, prioritizing her mental health and well-being over the continuation of the pregnancy.
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the legal presumption regarding pregnancy resulting from rape, as well as the best interest....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.