SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 120

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
‘X’ – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1194 of 2022
Decided on : 22-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Joshi, adv

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking termination of pregnancy.

Headnote:

Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Minor Girl - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971, Section 3

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a minor girl, sought a direction to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as she was a victim of alleged rape and sexual abuse. The petitioner's pregnancy was 8 weeks and 5 days long, and she sought termination within the permissible period of 20 weeks.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to be examined by a Medical Board to assess her mental/physical health and the length of her pregnancy. If the Medical Board opined that termination was in the petitioner's best interest to prevent injury to her mental health, the Chief Medical Officer was to make necessary arrangements for termination. The court also directed the collection of tissue and blood samples for DNA and other tests, and provided for medical/health support for the petitioner for three weeks after the procedure.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a minor victim of rape, should be allowed to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the provisions of Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, which allows termination of pregnancy up to 20 weeks and up to 24 weeks in certain cases. The court also relied on Explanation 2 to Section 3(2), which presumes that pregnancy caused by rape constitutes a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with directions for the petitioner's examination by a Medical Board, assessment of her mental/physical health, and termination of pregnancy if deemed in her best interest to prevent injury to her mental health.

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner is a minor girl, who was born on 27.09.2005, as per her date of birth recorded in High School Certificate. She is a victim of alleged rape and sexual abuse. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to respondents to terminate her pregnancy, as per provisions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

3. It is stated in the writ petition that she had made application to the Investigating Officer in respect of F.I.R. No. 188 of 2022 (registered on 25.05.2022 in P.S. Transit Camp, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar) seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy. She had made similar request to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar on 10.06.2022 by making an application, which is on record as Annexure-6 to the writ petition.

4. The relief sought in the writ petition is extracted below:-

    “i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to terminate the pregnancy of petitioner as per provisions of The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 and further The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act 2021 in pursuance to application submitted by the mother of the petitioner before the District Magistrate Udham Singh Nagar and Investigating officer of First Information Report No. 188 of 2022 under section 363 of IPC Police Station Transit Camp District Udham Singh Nagar and further direct the respondent to preserve the foetus for Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis test.”

5. Since petitioner is a minor, therefore, this writ petition has been filed through her mother/natural guardian.

6. The ultrasonography report dated 02.06.2022 is on record as Annexure-3 to the writ petition, which reveals that length of pregnancy is 8 weeks 5 days. Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as amended in 2021 is reproduced below:-

    “3. When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

[(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,—

(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or

(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the opinion, formed in good faith, that—

(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or

(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of clause (a), where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish caused by such pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

Explanation 2.—For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

(2-A) The norms for the registered medical practitioner whose opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act.

(2-B) The provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pr

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top