JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Anil Bhushan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. As per the office report dated 9th April, 2016 neither registered envelop nor, acknowledgement sent by the registered post to the respondent No.-5 has been received back.

3. In the circumstances, therefore, service of notice upon respondent No. 5 is deemed sufficient and the Court now proceeds to decide the matter.

4. The petitioner before this Court was selected and appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher in LT grade on 26th April, 1992 by the Committee of Management against a substantive vacancy which had fallen vacant on account of selection and appointment of the then Principal of the institution, namely, Jagat Pal Singh in the year 1986. The papers after selection was forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools, however he did not accord any financial approval forcing to the petitioner to file writ petition before this Court bearing Writ Petition No.-6623 of 1993 in which certain directions were issued on 15th April, 1993. While the matter remained pending before this Court, the Dist