IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANJAY YADAV, CJ., PRAKASH PADIA, J.
State of U.P. And 2 Others - Appellants
Versus
Jai Prakash Uttam And Another - Respondents
Special Appeal Defective No. 41 of 2021
Decided On : 16-06-2021
U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - U.P. High Schools And Intermediate Colleges (Payment Of Salaries Of Teachers And Other Employees) Act, 1971 - Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Regional Level Committee - Post of clerk - In Institution in question, there is only one sanctioned post of clerk which was held by one Raj Kumar Uttam. He retired from service after attaining age of superannuation - In Institution in question, there is huge strength of students and in order to discharge the proper work as well for disposal of official work, certain computers were purchased by Colleges Authorities. In order to fill up post of clerk, a decision was taken by Management to fill up the aforesaid post by way of direct recruitment by a person having full knowledge of operation of computer. Permission was granted by D.I.O.S. vide its order - Pursuant to advertisement petitioner-respondent as well as various other candidates applied for post. The petitioner-respondent was found most suitable candidates by Selection Committee. Subsequently papers of petitioner-respondent were transmitted before D.I.O.S. for obtaining prior approval which is mandatory requirement as per Regulation 101 contained in Chapter III of Act, 1921.
Finding of the court: Once advertisement and all consequential actions were quashed by this Court, there was no lawful process of selection of petitioner/respondent. The entire appointment process of petitioner/respondent was set aside by this Court, thus in absence of lawful selection process, the order impugned in special appeal is not tenable in law and is liable to be set aside - It is clear that the single post of Class III employee in Intermediate College has to filled up by promotion - Regional Level Committee while passing the order has not taken into consideration the fact that entire selection process of petitioner/respondent has already been set aside by this Court and has proceeded to examine claim of petitioner as petitioner/respondent was appointed after following procedure prescribed under Act & Regulations framed there under. The reason given in order which was impugned in writ petition, although are not tenable in law, but since selection process for post of clerk was quashed by this Court by order, order impugned in the present appeal is not tenable and is hereby set aside.
Result: Special appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Prakash Padia, J.
1. The matter is taken up through video conferencing.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The present Special Appeal has been filed by the appellant State challenging the judgement and order dated 03.03.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ A No.1228 of 2015.
4. It appears from perusal of the record that at Prem Puri Badagaon District Kanpur Nagar, there is an educational institution namely Jan Shikshan Inter College (In short “Institution”). The said Institution is governed by the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and U.P. High Schools And Intermediate Colleges (Payment Of Salaries Of Teachers And Other Employees) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1921 and Act, 1971” respectively). The Institution in question received grant in aid upto High School level. In the Institution in question, there is only one sanctioned post of clerk which was held by one Raj Kumar Uttam. He retired from service after attaining the age of superannuation on 30.05.2006. In the Institution in question, there is huge strength of the students and in order to discharge the proper work as well for disposal disposal of official work, certain computers were purchased by the Colleges Authorities. In order to fill up the post of clerk, a decision was taken by the Management to fill up the aforesaid post by way of direct recruitment by a person having full knowledge of operation of computer. In this regard an application was submitted by the Inbefore the District Inspector of Schools (In short “D.I.O.S.) for grant of permission in order to fill up the aforesaid post by direct recruitment. The permission was granted by the D.I.O.S. vide its order dated 19.10.2007. Pursuant to the same, advertisement was published in two daily newspapers namely Swatantra Bharat and Times of India on 24.10.2007 and 27.10.2007 respectively. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, the petitioner-respondent as well as various other candidates applied for the aforesaid post. The petitioner-respondent was found most suitable candidates by the Selection Committee. Subsequently, the papers of petitioner-respondent were transmitted before the D.I.O.S. for obtaining prior approval which is mandatory requirement as per Regulation 101 contained in Chapter III of the Act, 1921.
5. Before the aforesaid approval granted, one Narendra Singh, Class IV employee preferred Writ Petition No.57689 of 2007. In the aforesaid writ petition, interim order was granted by the learned Single Judge. Since the petitioner-respondent was not implemented in the aforesaid writ petition, he filed an application for his impleadment which was allowed. Apart from the petitioner-respondent, another class IV employee namely Virendra Kumar also filed impleadment which was also allowed. After hearing counsel for the parties, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by one Narendra Singh vide its judgment and order dated 21.09.2010. The learned Single Judge was pleased to cancel the advertisement dated 24.10.2007 and 27.10.2007 as well as consequential action as has been taken by the Committee of Management for Direct Appointment of Class III employee and the appointment of petitioner-respondent. Further directions were given to the Regional Level Committee headed by Regional Joint Director of Education to examine the claim of Narendra Singh as well as respondent no.6 (Virendara Kumar) and other candidates. The aforesaid order is reproduced below:-
This writ petition questions the selections on the solitary sanctioned post of clerk in Jan Shikshan Intermediate College Prempur, Badagaon, District Kanpur Nagar.
The petitio
Jai Bhagwan Singh Vs. District Inspector of Schools, Gautam Budh Nagar and others
Ashok Kumar Pandey and others Vs. Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mau and others
Post of Clerk – Selection process - Appointment of petitioner/respondent, if allowed, will amount allowing a person to be appointed without following procedure of law as selection process of petition....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher was made against a substantive vacancy, entitling the petitioner to regularization u....
The court upheld that the appointments made before changes in recruitment policy must be considered valid under the laws in effect at that time, emphasizing the integrity of the selection process.
The judgment establishes the principle that public officers must act reasonably and responsibly in their official duties, conforming to the rule of law. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring ....
The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
The court established that the absence of a nominee from the DBEO in the selection committee invalidates the appointment process, and that the provisions of the Act 1921 apply to institutions upgrade....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.