SIDDHARTHA VARMA, MANOJ BAJAJ
Vinay Prakash Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Instructions filed today by learned Standing Counsel be kept on record.
2. In pursuance of an e-tender notice dated 9.6.2017, the petitioner applied and when he was found to be the highest bidder for the mining of morum of 30,351 cubic meters in Plot no. 6 of Zone-10, area 10 acre, he was given a six months permit from 9.6.2017 to 8.12.2017. While the petitioner was excavating the morum, he got a notice dated 25.6.2017, which was numbered as Letter No. 356, and he was to give an explanation with regard to non submission of environmental clearance certificate and non installation of CCTV camera etc. Simultaneously, another notice was served upon the petitioner on 5.7.2017, wherein, the same notice number being Letter No. 356 was given and he was required to show cause as to why royalty and penalty for illegal mining of 5436 cubic meters be not taken from him.
3. On 12.7.2017, the petitioner's reply to the notice with regard to the illegal mining was submitted wherein it was stated that the petitioner had not done any illegal mining but in fact had carved out a certain path for reaching the place of mining. When the petitioner's reply was not being considered, he filed a w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.