Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANJEET PUROHIT
Mangu Singh S/o Madho Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the mauka-parcha/Panchnama dated 14.01.2024 (Annex.7), order/letter dated 19.07.2024 (Annex.8) may kindly be declared illegal and the same may kindly be quashed and set aside.
2. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the mauka-parcha dated 14.01.2024 (Annex. 70 may also be declared illegal and the same may also be quashed and set aside.
3. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be restrained from recovering any amount from the petitioner in relation to the order dated 14.01.2024 (Annex.7), order/letter dated 19.07.2024 (Annex. 8).
4. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Challenging the impugned recovery notice, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that recovery proceedings as per provisions of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 have been initiated against petitioner pursuant to original notice/order dated 30.01.2024 (Annexure-10). He further submitted that though said commu
Issuing a notice that effectively determines liability without due process violates the principles of natural justice, making the notice invalid.
Recovery proceedings must be based on lawful adjudication and adherence to principles of natural justice, not on arbitrary or unsubstantiated claims.
For the purpose of Rule 35-A, if the Government feels that the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 16.10.2018 were not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the D....
Pre-determined issuance of demand notices violates legal principles requiring fair process, rendering them null and void.
Writ petitions can be maintained against show cause notices if they demonstrate pre-determined conclusions by the authority, constituting a legal mala fide exercise of power.
Statutory authorities must exercise powers independently, and actions based on predetermination or external influence are deemed illegal.
Point of law: Rule 26(1) of APMMC Rules 1966, Rule 12(5)(h)(iii) of APMMC, 1966 for having excavated and transported 749 cum of Colour Granite without payment of seigniorage fee in contravention to c....
Writs under Article 226 can be maintained against predetermination by authorities, regardless of alternative remedies available, invalidating actions based on extraneous influences.
The principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, must be observed in administrative proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, particularly regarding orders affecting pro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
