Shree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad VS State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

AJAY BHANOT
Shree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shivendu Ojha, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: Vishakha Pande

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Radhakant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Dr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rakesh Pande, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Vishakha Pande, and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.

2. By the impugned order dated 27.02.2023 passed by the Prescribed Authority/Joint Magistrate/Upziladhari, Sadar, Varanasi, under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, the election set up by the respondent no. 4 has been upheld while the election claim of the petitioners has been invalidated.

3. Brief facts are these. Election to society was called on 18.02.2022 by the Chief Secretary/General Secretary of the Samrakshak Sabha by notice dated 23.01.2022. The said notice fixed Arya Mahila PG College, Varanasi as the election venue. On 04.02.2022 meeting called by the Joint Secretary of the All India Council resolved to change the venue of the election to Bharat Dharam Mahamandal Building, Jagatganj, Banaras.

4. Two elections were conducted by the rival parties at their respective venues. The competing election claims were presented before the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Varanasi. The Assis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

AJAY BHANOTShree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

AJAY BHANOT
Shree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent