IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ajay Bhanot, J.
Shree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad and another – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
WRIT -C No. -9252 of 2023
Decided On : 19-04-2023
Societies Registration Act - Election Dispute - 1860 - [Rule 35 of the Rules of the Association, Bye Law no. 29, Bye Law no. 35] - The court discussed the legality of the meetings and resolutions, the validity of the elections held at separate venues, and the interplay of relevant bye laws of the society. The court emphasized the special provision made for a specific purpose in Bye law No. 35 and ruled that an election meeting shall be governed and regulated only by Bye law No. 35. The court also highlighted the importance of the venue of the election and the influence of the Division Bench's findings on the issue.
Fact of the Case:
The dispute arose from conflicting elections held by rival parties at different venues. The petitioners challenged the election set up by the respondent no. 4, invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The Court analyzed the legality of the meetings and resolutions, the validity of the elections held at separate venues, and the interplay of relevant bye laws of the society. The Court emphasized the special provision made for a specific purpose in Bye law No. 35 and ruled that an election meeting shall be governed and regulated only by Bye law No. 35. The Court also highlighted the importance of the venue of the election and the influence of the Division Bench's findings on the issue.
Issues: The legality of the meetings and resolutions dated 23.01.2022 and 04.02.2022 called by the rival parties, and the validity of the elections held by the parties respectively at separate venues.
Ratio Decidendi: The special provision made for a specific purpose in Bye law No. 35 prevails over the general law in Bye law No. 29, governing and regulating election meetings. The venue of the election was conclusively adjudicated by the Division Bench, influencing the Court's decision.
Final Decision: The impugned order upholding the election claim set up by the respondent no. 4 was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Assistant Registrar to conduct the election in a fair and transparent manner within a specified period.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Radhakant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Dr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rakesh Pande, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Vishakha Pande, and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.
2. By the impugned order dated 27.02.2023 passed by the Prescribed Authority/Joint Magistrate/Upziladhari, Sadar, Varanasi, under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, the election set up by the respondent no. 4 has been upheld while the election claim of the petitioners has been invalidated.
3. Brief facts are these. Election to society was called on 18.02.2022 by the Chief Secretary/General Secretary of the Samrakshak Sabha by notice dated 23.01.2022. The said notice fixed Arya Mahila PG College, Varanasi as the election venue. On 04.02.2022 meeting called by the Joint Secretary of the All India Council resolved to change the venue of the election to Bharat Dharam Mahamandal Building, Jagatganj, Banaras.
4. Two elections were conducted by the rival parties at their respective venues. The competing election claims were presented before the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Varanasi. The Assistant Registrar vide order dated 28.06.2022 recognized the election set up by the respondent no. 4 and invalidated the claim of the petitioner. Aggrieved the petitioners invoked the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and instituted a writ petition which was registered as Writ C No. 20203 of 2022 (Shree Arya Mahila Hitakarini Mahaparishad and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others). The learned single Judge by judgment rendered on 20.10.2022 ruled as follows:
5. The order passed by the learned single Judge was carried in appeal by respondent no. 4 which came to be registered as Special Appeal No. 692 of 2022 (Dr. Shashi Kant Dixit vs. State of U.P. and Others). The learned Division Bench affirmed the judgment of the learned Single Judge and dismissed the appeal by judgment dated 16.12.2022. However, various observations were made by the learned Division Bench which influence the controversy till date. The learned Division Bench in Special Appeal No. 692 of 2022 (supra) dealing with the argument relating to invalidity of the notice and change of the election venue observed thus:
The special provision made for a specific purpose in Bye law No. 35 prevails over the general law in Bye law No. 29, governing and regulating election meetings.
The Assistant Registrar lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on the validity of elections under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and any disputes must be referred to the prescribed authority under S....
Where orders are passed condoning the delay, they are discretionary orders and ought not to be interfered with.
Court emphasized that judicial intervention in ongoing election processes should be avoided to uphold the democratic framework, reserving disputes for resolution post-election.
The court upheld the necessity of conducting elections for a co-operative society as per established rules, emphasizing that procedural irregularities do not impede ongoing democratic processes once ....
The removal of the Election Officer without proper notice or jurisdiction violated principles of natural justice, affirming that legislative gaps can be addressed judicially to ensure fair elections.
Section 15 of Rajasthan General Clauses Act is merely a power to State to revise its own orders.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the General Body meeting and election process under the Societies Registration Act, 1975.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.