SIDDHARTH
Ramesh Chand Kingar – Appellant
Versus
Basant Kumar Bansal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jagdish Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for setting aside the judgment and order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 15, Muzaffar Nagar in Civil Revision No. 85 of 2014 (Basant Kumar Bansal & Another vs. Ramesh Chand Kingar & Others).
3. Plaintiffs/respondents instituted an Original Suit No. 223 of 2009 against the defendants-petitioners & defendants-respondents for the relief of permanent prohibitory injunction praying that defendants may be restrained from using gallery of the plaintiffs in any manner, which is shown as A, B, C, D, E, F in plaint map. Defendants-petitioners are the contesting parties and they filed their written statement and denied the aforesaid plaint allegation. As per the plaintiffs-respondents, gallery shown as A, B, C, D, E, F exclusively belongs to them and defendants-petitioners have no right in the said gallery. However, defendants-petitioners claimed that they were using the said gallery since beginning just like setback of their house an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.