Radhey Shyam VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUNITA AGARWAL, SADHNA RANI (THAKUR)
Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijendra Singh, Amit Mishra, Ashutosh Yadav, Shyam Lal, Suresh Dhar Dwivedi

Table of Content
1. introduction of case and conviction details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the incident leading to convictions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. medical examination and cause of death. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. defence arguments regarding witness credibility. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
5. prosecution rebuttal and evidence reliability. (Para 34 , 36 , 38)
6. court's analysis and acceptance of witness testimonies. (Para 41 , 42)
7. court's findings on common intention and liability. (Para 57 , 58 , 59)
8. conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Ms. Abhilasha Singh learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Roopak Chaubey learned A.G.A for the State respondent.

2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.07.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court Badaun whereby appellants Radheshyam s/o Dwariki Yadav, Sreepal s/o Dwariki Yadav resident of Shikarpurthana Sahaswan District Badaun have been held guilty of the offences under Sections 302 , 506(2) IPC. Under Section 302 , the appellants have been convicted for life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-for each. The default punishment is one year additional r