CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Vibha @ Guddi – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri R.C. Singh learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Amit Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashish Agarwal as well as Ms. Rupal Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The brief facts of the case are that father of the petitioner, namely, Late Hari Lal was recorded as tenure-holder of Khata No. 8, Plot No. 311 area 0.120 Hectare, Plot No. 314 area 0.0510 Hectare 372Ka area 0.510 Hectare, 318/706 area 0.130 Hectare, Khata No. 9, Plot No. 313 area 4.6920 Hectare and Khata No.10, Plot No. 374 area 0.9480 Hectare, situated at Village-Kherli Hafizpur, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Dadari, District Gautam Buddha Nagar. Petitioner’s father was not satisfied with his son, namely, Yogesh and his family members, hence he was residing with the petitioner who is daughter. Accordingly, petitioner's father, Hari Lal executed an unregistered Will-deed dated 10.12.1990 in favour of the petitioner. Petitioner’s father, Hari Lal has died on 11.03.1992. Petitioner filed an application for mutation on 08.11.2016 that is about after 24 years in which respondent No. 3 filed an objection that she is owne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.