SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Vibha @ Guddi – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amit Kumar
For the Respondents: C.S.C., Ashish Agrawal, Rupal Agarwal.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri R.C. Singh learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Amit Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashish Agarwal as well as Ms. Rupal Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The brief facts of the case are that father of the petitioner, namely, Late Hari Lal was recorded as tenure-holder of Khata No. 8, Plot No. 311 area 0.120 Hectare, Plot No. 314 area 0.0510 Hectare 372Ka area 0.510 Hectare, 318/706 area 0.130 Hectare, Khata No. 9, Plot No. 313 area 4.6920 Hectare and Khata No.10, Plot No. 374 area 0.9480 Hectare, situated at Village-Kherli Hafizpur, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Dadari, District Gautam Buddha Nagar. Petitioner’s father was not satisfied with his son, namely, Yogesh and his family members, hence he was residing with the petitioner who is daughter. Accordingly, petitioner's father, Hari Lal executed an unregistered Will-deed dated 10.12.1990 in favour of the petitioner. Petitioner’s father, Hari Lal has died on 11.03.1992. Petitioner filed an application for mutation on 08.11.2016 that is about after 24 years in which respondent No. 3 filed an objection that she is owne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top