MOHD. FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Param Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Dharmendra Singhal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Shivendra Raj Singhal, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Prashant Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed by the appellant-Param Singh with the prayer to set-aside the impugned judgment and order dated 17.01.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T.) Act, Amroha in Sessions Case No. 863 of 2022 (State of U.P. vs. Adarsh Kumar Paricharak), arising out of Case Crime No. 121 of 2022, under Sections 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Police Station Hasanpur, District Amroha and to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid sessions case.
3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant while drawing the attention of this Court towards the impugned order of date 17.01.2023, submits that the Special Court has committed manifest illegality in passing the impugned order, whereby the cognizance has been taken and the app
Abhinandan Jha and Ors. v. Dinesh Mishra MANU/SC/0054/1967 : AIR 1968 SC 117 : (1967) 3 SCR 668
Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre v. State of Maharashtra MANU/ SC/0830/2004 : (2004) 7 SCC 768
H.S. Bains, Director, Small Saving-cum-Deputy Secretary Finance, Punjab
Mohammad Yusuf Vs. State of U.P. 2007 (9) ADJ 294
Minu Kumari and another Vs. State of Bihar and others; MANU/SC/8098/2006 : 2006 (4) SCC 359
Vishnu Kumar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and others’ reported in (2019) 8 SCC 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.