Ved Krishna vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2113

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2113

SHAMIM AHMED
Ved Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr.Rishad Murtaza, Mr.Aishwarya Mishra, Mr.Syed Ali Jafar Rizvi
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. application for quashing proceedings (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. allegations of false implication and mechanical summoning (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. judicial requirement for taking cognizance (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. importance of judicial mind in investigations (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. necessity of judicial reasoning in cognizance (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. criticism of mechanical judicial orders (Para 24)
7. invalidity of the summoning order (Para 25)
8. conclusion and remittance of the matter (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

Shamim Ahmed, J.

Heard Sri Rishad Murtaza, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Manoj Singh learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the proceedings of Case No.1004/2019 pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Faizabad under Sections 427 , 188 I.P.C. relating to Crime No.493/2018, Police Station Pura Kalandar, District Faizabad as well as summoning order dated 02.04.2019 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I Faizabad in Case No.1004/2019, relating to Crime No.493/