JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha/respondent no.7 and the learned Standing Counsel representing respondent nos. 1 to 6.

2. Petitioners have invoked the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.11.2019 passed by the Consolidation Officer in Case No. 593 (State of U.P. Vs. Shyam Lal and others) and three separate orders dated 26.11.2019 passed in case No. 628 (State of U.P. Vs. Shyam Lal and others), 660 (State of U.P. Vs. Shyam Lal and others) and 630 (State of U.P. Vs. Shyam Lal and others) respectively.

3. Grievance of the petitioners is that the Consolidation Officer has passed the impugned orders without issuing any notice to the recorded tenure holders and without affording them opportunity of hearing.

4. Instant writ petition relates to plots No. 1418/7, 1193, 1574/2 and 1188 which were record in the name of Shyam Lal and others respectively. Against the aforesaid entries, consolidator has submitted separate reports dated 15.11.2019 and 19.11.2019 respectively for expunging the names of recorded tenure holders from t