SUNITA AGARWAL, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Uma Kant – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Tahira Kazmi and Quazi Mohammad Akram learned counsels for the petitioners and Sri Suresh Singh learned Standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 7.
2. The case of the learned counsel for the petitioners, who are three in number, as worded in the writ petition is that they are recorded tenure holders of the land situate in Tehsil Meja, District Prayagraj. In paragraph ‘3’ of the writ petition it is averred that the petitioner no. 1 is the tenure holder of the land being Gata No. 34 measuring 0.137 hectares and Gata No. 37 measuring 0.068 hectares situated at Gram Khaur, Tehsil Meja, District Prayagraj. Further averments have been made that the petitioner no. 2 is also the tenure holder of the land being Gata No. 524/2 measuring area 0.132 hectare situated at Gram Lutar, Tehsil Meja, District Prayagraj. Similarly in paragraph 4 of the writ petition it has further been averred that the petitioner no. 3 is also the tenure holder of the land, Gata No. 97 Ga (Wrongly typed as 37Ga) measuring 0.1830 hectares situated at Gram Tigja, Tappa Kohdar, Tehsil Meja, District Prayagraj.
3. It is further the case of the writ petitioners that since their plots
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.