Back
RAJAN ROY
Vivek Kumar Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. , Thru. Addl Chief Secy. Secondary, Education Deptt. Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of multiple writ petitions together (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. relief clauses of writ petitions concerning eligibility dates (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. petitioner's claim regarding eligibility based on seniority and experience (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. challenge against empanelment and selection process (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. questions raised regarding eligibility and standing in writ petitions (Para 18 , 23) |
| 6. legal foundations regarding direct recruitment and seniority rules (Para 25 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. determining eligibility and necessary qualifications for recruitment (Para 55 , 58 , 62) |
| 8. conclusion on petitions and considerations for future recruitment processes (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajan Roy, J.
1. Heard Shri Ashit Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel along with Sri K.M. Shukla, Shri R.C. Tiwari, Shri Shard Pathak and Shri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri Raj Kumar Singh Suryavanshi and Shri Raishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the Board and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. All the writ petitions involve similar facts and issues, therefore, they were heard together and are now being decided by a common judg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
