IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
Bal Kumar Patel Alias Raj Kumar - Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Respondents
Application U/S 482 No. 10778 of 2022 With Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. 8945 of 2020
Decided On : 09-12-2022
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun, Advocate learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jitendra Prasad Mishra, Advocate learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the records.
2. These two petitions are connected together as they relate to the same case and are of the same accused and as such are being decided by a common order.
3. Criminal Misc. Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (hereinafter referred to as “the 482 petition”) has been filed by the applicant-Bal Kumar Patel @ Raj Kumar with the following prayers:-
3. That it is further prayed that during the pendency of the present criminal misc. application, the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 02 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 0831 of 2020 under Sections 419 , 420 and 406 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Banda on which cognizance was taken up on 2.11.2021 following the submission of charge sheet against the applicant on 29.9.2021 by the police of Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Banda may remain stayed and also further be pleased to pass an interim order in favour of the applicant, granting protection from arrest by directing the investigative authorities not to take any coercive action against him and / or be pleased fit and proper to pass such order as the Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; so that justice be done.”
4. Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. (hereinafter referred to as “the anticipatory bail application”) has been filed by the applicant-Bal Kumar Patel @ Raj Kumar with the following prayers:-
It is further prayed that during the pendency of this application before this Hon’ble Court the interim order be issued directing the P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Band (or any other investigating agency of the State of U.P.) not to apprehend the applicant in Case Crime No. 831 of 2020 u/s 419, 420 and 406 I.P.C., And/or may pass such other & further order as this Hon’ble Court, may deem, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
5. A counter affidavit dated 21.05.2021 has been filed in the anticipatory bail application which has been sworn by Mohammad Akram Sub-Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda. In the said counter affidavit paragraph 10 & 12 referred to the applicant having criminal history and thereby stating in both the paragraphs that he is a habitual criminal. Paragraph 10 & 12 of the said counter affidavit is quoted herein-below:-
12. That the contents of paragraph No. 16, 17, 18
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab
State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma
Trisuns Chemical Industry Vs. Rajesh Agarwal and Ors.
M. Krishnan Vs. Vijay Singh & Anr.
Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & another
M.N. Ojha Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastava
Joseph Salvaraj A. Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Arun Bhandari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Md. Allauddin Khan Vs. State of Bihar
Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), Department of Home and Anr.
Rajeev Kourav Vs. Balasaheb & others
Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Ramveer Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P.
Hamida v. Rashid @ Rasheed and Others
Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth v. State of Gujarat
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Narinderjit Singh Sahni v. Union of India
The applicant, who concealed facts and filed a false affidavit, and made a mockery of the orders of the lower court by avoiding the process of summon, bailable warrant, non-bailable warrant, and the ....
The court established that a person cannot be deemed a proclaimed offender without a formal declaration under Section 82(4) CrPC, allowing for the possibility of anticipatory bail.
The court reaffirmed that anticipatory bail can be granted in serious offences unless specifically excluded by law, and that the discretion to grant bail must consider the individual circumstances of....
The court emphasized the delicate balance between personal liberty and societal interest in deciding anticipatory bail applications, considering the nature and gravity of the accusation, the accused'....
The court emphasized the need for custodial interrogation based on prima facie evidence of forgery, and highlighted the balance between personal liberty and societal interest in granting anticipatory....
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy, granted sparingly in serious cases, and requires compliance with court conditions; failure to do so can lead to rejection of bail applications.
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted sparingly, especially in serious cases, and requires strict compliance with court-imposed conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.