SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGEETA CHANDRA
Surya Lekha Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arvind Srivastava, Akash Mishra
For the Respondent: Ram Bilas Yadav

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri R.B. Yadav, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent nos.5 and 6.

2. This writ petition has been filed for a direction to be issued to the respondents to pay the pension and other post retiral benefits such as Gratuity, Provident Fund, salary of the petitioner from 08.09.2010 to 31.03.2017 and fix the pension of the petitioner on the basis of pay scale to which the petitioner is entitled to get on 31.03.2017 along with interest of 12% per annum calculated on the quarterly compound basis on all outstanding dues.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that she was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher on 29.03.1985 in Junior High School, Midhakur-II, Block Bichpuri, Agra and she was given promotional pay scale after a lapse of ten years on 27.05.1995. She was promoted on 12.07.2007 as Head Mistress in Junior High School, Midhakur where she was working as Assistant Teacher. She joined as Head Mistress on 17.07.2007 and continued to work as such. It so happened that one Assistant Teacher, Abha Jain stopped coming to the institution since 15.01.2009. She had influence over the off

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top