MOHD. ASLAM
Nikhil Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Abhijeet Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri S.N. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
2. The instant revision has been preferred by the revisionist-husband against the judgement and order dated 28.5.2019 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautambudh Nagar in Case No.59 of 2016, by which the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. moved by opposite party no.2-wife was allowed and the revisionist was directed to pay maintenance amount of Rs.8000/-per month to opposite party no.2 and Rs.4000/-per month for his daughter Raina Jaiswal from the date of filing of the application. Feeling aggrieved by it, the revisionist-husband of the opposite party no.2-wife has preferred this revision.
3. The brief facts necessary for disposal of this revision is that the marriage of opposite party no.2 Monika Jaiswal was solemnized with revisionist Nikhil Kumar Jaiswal according to Hindu Rites and Rituals on 28.1.2012 at her parent’s house at Mohan Road, Deoria and her father had given gifts as dowry beyond his capacity to the in-laws of opposite part
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.