Gajala vs State Of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 478

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 478

RENU AGARWAL
Gajala – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Umesh Chandra Prajapati

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioners with prayer for issuing writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners as husband and wife.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as per aadhar card the date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 03.01.1993 and she is aged about 31 years and the date of birth of the petitioner No.2 as per his aadhar card is 07.09.2002 and he is aged about more than 21 years. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 was earlier married with one Shahrukh on 04.03.2014 and since the petitioner No. 1 was not able to conceive, she was thrown out from her matrimonial house. Thereafter, in the year 2022 when the petitioners No.1 was working in NOIDA, she met petitioner No. 2 and since then they are living in relationship. It is further submitted that the parents of petitioner no.1 and her other family members are interfering in their peaceful live-in-relationship. The petitioners apprehend dang