RENU AGARWAL
Alfiya Azmil – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J.
Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioners with prayer for issuing writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to secure the security of life and property of the petitioners from the respondent No.4.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and perused the record.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and are of marriageable age. It is further submitted that petitioner No.1 is daughter of respondent No.4 and she belong to Muslim community. The date of birth of petitioner No. 1 is 20.01.2006 and the date of birth of petitioner no. 2 is 13.06.2001, in support thereof the petitioners have brought on record their High School marksheet-cum-Certificates respectively which are annexed as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition respectively. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live-in-relationship since about last 5 to 6 months. Both the petitioners intend to marry each other after lawful
The court ruled that a live-in relationship cannot be protected under law if one party is a minor at its inception and no application for conversion has been filed as mandated by the Uttar Pradesh Pr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the protection of live-in-relationships must comply with the statutory provisions, including the requirement for conversion under the Uttar Pr....
Interfaith couples must comply with conversion laws to seek legal protection for their relationship under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
Compliance with the U.P. Prevention of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act and evidence of a domestic relationship are crucial factors in seeking protection for interfaith live-in relationships.
The right to live together in an interfaith relationship is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, guarding personal liberty against familial and societal coercion.
Live-in relationships are legally recognized, and individuals have the right to choose partners, protected under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
A valid divorce must be obtained before entering into a new marriage; otherwise, the subsequent marriage is not recognized legally.
The legal point established is the requirement for a live-in relationship to fulfill conditions akin to marriage and the need for evidence of a permanent relationship to be considered for protection ....
The right to life and personal liberty extends to individuals in live-in relationships, necessitating state protection against familial threats, irrespective of marriageability or societal norms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.