SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1856

RENU AGARWAL
Alfiya Azmil – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Deena Nath,Deepak Kumar,Shubham Yadav.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J.

Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioners with prayer for issuing writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to secure the security of life and property of the petitioners from the respondent No.4.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and perused the record.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and are of marriageable age. It is further submitted that petitioner No.1 is daughter of respondent No.4 and she belong to Muslim community. The date of birth of petitioner No. 1 is 20.01.2006 and the date of birth of petitioner no. 2 is 13.06.2001, in support thereof the petitioners have brought on record their High School marksheet-cum-Certificates respectively which are annexed as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition respectively. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live-in-relationship since about last 5 to 6 months. Both the petitioners intend to marry each other after lawful

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top