Roshani vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2124

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2124

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Roshani – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohd Hamid.

JUDGMENT :

(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.)

Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:-

i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to protect and safe-guard the life and liberty of the petitioners as well as directing to the respondent no. 4 to not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners without any authority of law as such they are living as live-in relationship as husband and wife.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Mohd Hamid, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents, Sri Hasan Abbas and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are presently living in live-in relationship out of free will and choice after attaining the age of majority. The date of birth of petitioner No. 1 is mentioned as 08.03.2000 in her Class VIII Transfer Certificate as well as in her Voter I.D. Card, the date of birth of petitioner No. 2 is mentioned as 01.01.1998 in his Aadhar Card. They have right to live together without interference of any person being consenting adults. They hav