SHAMIM AHMED
Pappu @ Dhani Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by convict appellant-Pappu @ Dhani Ram against judgment of conviction dated 08.12.2008 passed by learned Special Judge, Gangster Act, Lucknow in Case No.90 of 1998, State Vs. Birju and Others, Case Crime No.78 of 1997, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao, convicting and sentencing the appellant under Section 3(1) of The Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for two years and six months rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulations.
2. Learned counsel for convict appellant argued that the appellant had been convicted and sentenced with two years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/-and in default with further imprisonment of one month, which was a severe sentence, against the evidence on record. Trial Court failed to appreciate facts and evidence placed before it, resulting this perversity. He further argued that six criminal cases were shown as criminal history against appellant in gang chart. There was no independent witness of public to prove prosecution case, except police and official witnesses, who were examined before t
Narbada Prasad v. Chhaganlal & Ors.; AIR 1969 SC 395
Pratap Vs. State of U.P.; AIR 1976 SC 966
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit Vs. State of Maharashtra; AIR 1981 SC 765
The prosecution bears the burden of proving the accused's connection with the crime and satisfying the essential requirements for attracting the provisions of the Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 to the appellant's actions, and the court's interp....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the accused's involvement in anti-social activities or specified offenses under the Act, and the co....
(1) A person against whom a single FIR/charge sheet is filed for any of anti-social activities mentioned in section 2(b) of Gangsters Act, 1986 can be prosecuted under Gangsters Act.(2) Provisions of....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of procedural compliance and due application of mind in cases under the Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention Act, 1986), highlighting the fundamenta....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.