SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Sanjay – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. By means of this bail application, applicants seek bail in Case Crime No. 738 of 2023, under Sections- 147, 148, 149, 307 I.P.C. and Sections- 3/4/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station-Baraut, District- Baghpat, during pendency of trial.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicants that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the instant case crime number with ulterior motive. The recovery of knife has been shown against the applicant, whereas the injury report appended along with the affidavit in support of this bail application shows that the injury caused to the injured (who is one of the persons with the police party) was caused by fire arm and so far as regarding the criminal history of the applicants is concerned, in all the matters they have already been granted bail by the concerned trial court, which have been explained in para- 3 of the supplementary affidavit. The applicants are languishing in jail since 16.10.2023 and in case they are releas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.