SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1033

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Sanjay Mali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Zafar Khan, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 81/2022 of Police Station Kotwali Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 323 & 307 of IPC and Section 3/25 of the arms act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Police recorded the statement of the present petitioner, in which F.I.R. was registered. But later on the Police implicated the present petitioner as an accused, whereas the present petitioner himself fired on his body and received injuries. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top