SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1156

DEEPAK VERMA
Asif – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohd Faiz.

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK VERMA, J.

1. Heard Sri Mohd. Faiz, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Adhar Ram, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 216 of 2022, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506, 354, 427, 336, 452 I.P.C. Police Station Baheri, District Bareilly during pendency of the trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is a case of counterblast as both the parties have lodged FIR and both the parties have sustained injuries. It cannot be said that who is the aggressor. Injuries received by opposite side are simple in nature. He next submitted that co-accused, namely, Kasim, has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 21270 of 2022 vide order dated 15.07.2022, hence, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of same footing. The applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is languishing in jail since 02.04.2022. In case, the applicant i

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top