PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Sanjay Kumar Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 633 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, Police Station - Gandhi Park, District - Aligarh.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that there was inordinate delay in lodging the FIR, which had not been explained; the applicant and victim both are not apprehended together and victim herself contacted the police and file notory stating therein that due to some altercation between the victim and her family she left her house and gone to Delhi alone; according to medical report age of the victim is between 17 to 18 years; the applicant has neither enticed the victim nor eloped her at any point of time in fact the victim is consenting party and she herself left her parent's house and in the light of above, no offense is made out against the applicant; the applicant has no previous criminal history. It is also submitted that there is no appreh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.