SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Smt. Mala Yadav & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. - Respondents
Writ - A Nos. 40447, 55061 of 2014, 39733 of 2017
Decided On : 16-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ajay Kumar Mishra, Abhishek Kumar Yadav, Ashok Khare, Chandan Sharma, Prabhakar Awasthi, V.K. Yadav, Siddharth Khare, Shantanu Khare, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., A.K. Yadav, Archana Singh, B.P. Singh, Vikram Bahadur Singh, Bhanu Pratap Singh, Mohd Shere Ali.

IMPORTANT POINT
The judgment established that the Nursery Training Certificate is not equivalent to the required qualifications for the appointment of Assistant Teachers, as per the NCTE notifications.

Headnote:

Nursery Training Certificate - Appointment of Assistant Teachers - National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) Notifications dated 23.08.2010 and 29.07.2011 - The court considered whether the Nursery Training Certificate is equivalent to Diploma in Elementary Education and Basic Training Certificate (BTC) for the appointment of Assistant Teachers in primary schools. The court found that the Nursery Training Certificate is not equivalent to the required qualifications for the appointment of Assistant Teachers, as per the NCTE notifications, and dismissed the writ petitions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners had passed the Nursery Training Certificate and Uttar Pradesh Teachers Eligibility Test, 2013 (TET) and participated in counseling for the appointment of Assistant Teachers. They were not appointed on the ground that they did not possess the essential qualification of a 2 years BTC Course/2 years Urdu BTC Course or Special BTC Course, and that the Nursery Training Certificate would not be equivalent to the said essential qualification.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Nursery Training Certificate is not equivalent to the required qualifications for the appointment of Assistant Teachers, as per the NCTE notifications, and dismissed the writ petitions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Nursery Training Certificate is equivalent to the required qualifications for the appointment of Assistant Teachers in primary schools.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the NCTE notifications dated 23.08.2010 and 29.07.2011, and the course material of the Nursery Training Certificate and Basic Training Certificate, and found that the Nursery Training Certificate is not equivalent to the required qualifications for the appointment of Assistant Teachers.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions and vacated the interim orders.

JUDGMENT :

1. Petitioners before this Court have passed Certificate in Nursery Training Examination-2013 (for short “Nursery Training Certificate”) conducted by Examination Regulatory Authority, Uttar Pradesh (for short “Authority”) and their respective certificates are part of record.

2. Petitioners have also passed Uttar Pradesh Teachers Eligibility Test, 2013 (for short “TET”) and thereafter participated in counselling for appointment of Assistant Teachers but they were not appointed purportedly on a ground that they have not possessed essential qualification in terms of notification/ advertisement dated 17.10.2013 i.e. they have not qualified 2 years BTC Course/2 years Urdu BTC Course or Special BTC Course and that “Nursery Training Certificate” would not be equivalent to said essential qualification. For reference, Vigyapti/ Advertisement for district Barabanki dated 17.10.2013 is mentioned below :-

3. Essentially, case of the petitioners is that Nursery Training Certificate is equivalent to Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatsoever name known) in terms of notification dated 23.08.2010 issued by National Council for Teachers Education (fort short “NCTE”) as such it would be equivalent to BTC Course.

4. It is further case of the petitioners that after enforcement of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short “Act of 2009”) and thereafter enforcement of Uttar Pradesh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 (for short “Rules of 2011”), and whereby subsequent to notification issued by NCTE (competent authority) which provided minimum qualification for appointment of Assistant Teacher in primary school and promotion of Assistant Teacher in State of UP have to be in terms of Notification dated 23.08.2010 and amended Notification dated 29.07.2011 issued by NCTE.

5. Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by S/Sri Himanshu Singh, Prabhakar Awasthi and Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently referred and placed reliance upon notification dated 23.08.2010 issued by NCTE that minimum qualification for teachers of class I to V is Senior Secondary or its equivalent with at least 50% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatsoever name known) and that since the petitioners have Nursery Training Certificates which is equivalent to Diploma in Elementary Education though known by said terminology and is also equivalent to Basic Training Certificate i.e. BTC, therefore, they possessed minimum eligibility.

6. Learned Senior Advocate also urged that minimum qualification prescribed in terms of aforesaid notification dated 23.08.2010 has not been completely followed by respondents and despite petitioners were duly eligible having minimum educational qualification were wrongly denied from their appointment despite they participated in counselling and they would have definitely in merit list if their result were declared.

7. In support of his submissions, learned Senior Advocate has placed reliance upon a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal (D) No. 130 of 2014 (Harsh Kumar and another vs. State of U.P. and others) passed on 05.02.2014 and relevant paragraphs thereof are mentioned below :-

    “8. On 23 August 2010, the NCTE prescribed the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher for Classes I to VIII in a school referred to in Section 2 (n) of the Act of 2009 with effect from the date of notification. This notification was amended by the notification dated 29 July 2011. As per the amended notification, the minimum qualifications which have been prescribed for appointment of an Assistant Teacher for teaching students from Classes I to V are now as follows:

“(i) Classes I-V.

(a) Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by what

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top