SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1914 Supreme(All) 365

RYVES, PIGGOTT
Munshi Lal – Appellant
Versus
Notified Area of Baraut – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.L. Agarwala.
For the Respondent: Mr. W. Wallach.

JUDGMENT :

Ryves, Piggott, JJ.

This is a first appeal from an order of remand, and is one of a series of connected appeals which may be disposed of by a single judgement. In Baraut, in the Meerut district, there is certain land which is the property of Government, though it has been assigned for purposes of management to the Notified Area Committee. That body desired to establish a market upon this land in the neighbourhood of a railway station. It was accordingly arranged that leases of portions of the said land should be granted for a period of years to a number of traders and merchants, subject to certain conditions, the object of which was to secure the effective establishment of the desired market. Owing to circumstances with which we are not concerned the scheme has fallen through, the lessees have taken no action under their leases, and no market has been established. The case for the plaintiffs is that the lessees have broken their contract and are liable under the terms of the contract for various sums of money, for the recovery of which these suits have been brought. The lessees set up number of defences, with only one of which we are now concerned. There was indeed another

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top