IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR
Ajit Kumar Sonkar @ Ajeet And Others – Appellants
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow And Others – Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.618 of 2024
Decided on : 24-07-2024
ENCROACHMENT - PUBLIC UTILITY LAND - The court addressed the issue of illegal encroachment on public utility land, emphasizing the importance of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which provides a remedy for such situations. The court directed the petitioner to utilize the statutory provisions available under Section 26 to seek removal of the encroachment, thereby reinforcing the legal framework for addressing public land disputes.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a court order to remove illegal encroachments on public utility land in Village Bhadwa somvanshi, claiming that the private respondent was obstructing the land recorded as Rasta despite multiple complaints.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which allows for the removal of obstacles impeding public land use. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but provided a procedural direction.
Issues: Whether the petitioner has a legal remedy to address the illegal encroachment on public utility land and the appropriate course of action to take.
Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the petitioner should utilize the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, specifically Section 26, to seek redress for the encroachment, thereby affirming the statutory framework for resolving such disputes.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner the liberty to file an application under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, with a directive for the Tehsildar to consider and decide the application expeditiously.
JUDGMENT :
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 to 5.
2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Petitioner approached this court seeking a direction to State respondents to remove the encroachment over the land of Gata No. 419Kha/0.1050 hectare situated in Village Bhadwa somvanshi, Pargana, Tehsil and District Gonda.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that private respondent is illegally encroaching upon the land of Gata No. 419/Kha/0.1050 hectare situated at aforesaid village despite the fact that the same is public utility land and recorded as Rasta. He further submits that petitioner has given several complaints regarding the illegal encroachment which has been done by the private respondents over the public utility land but the same are not concluded till date.
5. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has submitted that petitioner has efficacious remedy under Sections 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 where it has been provided if the Tehsildar finds that any obstacle impedes the free use of a public road, path or common land of a village or obstructs the road or water course or source of water, he may direct the removal of such obstacle and may, for that purpose, use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary and may recover the cost.
6. Learned counsel for petitioner at this stage submits that petitioner may be given liberty to move an application under Section 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent authority.
7. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition, is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move applications under Sections 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code before the concerned Tehsildar and in case such applications are is made within two weeks from today, said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law.
AI
The court reinforced the principle that statutory remedies under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, must be pursued for resolving disputes related to encroachments on public utility land.
All State Governments in the country that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/poramboke/shamlat land and these must be restored to ....
The court reinforced that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking the High Court's extraordinary jurisdiction in matters of land encroachment.
The court established that authorities must prioritize the removal of illegal encroachments on public land, with regularization being a rare exception.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.