SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1392

SANGEET LODHA, MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Mukna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Prakash Vishnoi, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is preferred by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to remove the illegal and unauthorized encroachment made by encroachers on the land comprising Khasra No.219, 143, 172, 586/172, 702/226, 226, 227, 442, 445, 403, 804/702 and 183 of village Aabsar,Teshil Sujangarh, District Churu, which is alleged to have been recorded in the revenue record as 'Gair Mumkin Pasture', 'Johad Paytan Land' and 'Gair Mumkin Public Way'.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite representations being made by the petitioner the District Collector, Churu, the respondents have not taken any steps for removal of the encroachment made over the land in question.

The respondents are under an obligation to remove the encroachment made on the public utility land, Gochar and Oran land etc. keeping in view the directions issued by this Court in the case of Gulab Kothari (supra) and the directions/guidelines issued by a Coordinate Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No.10819/2018 : Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. vide order dated 30.01.2019 reads as under:

    "In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top