SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Kritika Kaushik Alias Hanu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Ms. Shreya Gupta, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Mithilesh Kumar, learned AGA for State and Sri Rizwan Ahamad, Advocate for Complainant.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 3921 of 2023, under Sections 34, 108, 328, 344, 347, 384, 406, 500, 506, 511 IPC and summoning order dated 18.12.2023 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Ghaziabad, whereby Applicant-1, Kritika Kaushik has been summoned under Section 406 IPC and Applicant-2, Naresh Kumar Kaushik has been summoned under Sections 504, 384 IPC.
3. In the present case Applicant-1 is daughter-in-law of Opposite Party No. 2 and Applicant-2 is father of Applicant-1.
4. Learned counsel for applicants submits that even contents of complaint and statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. considered to be true, still ingredients of Sections 384, 504, 406 IPC are not made out and she refers relevant part of impugned order, which is reproduced hereinafter:
5. Learned counsel further submits that date mentioned in complaint
Dhananjay @ Dhandnjay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and others
M/s Eicher Tractor Ltd. and others vs. Harihar Singh and another
Mohammad Wajid and another vs. State of U.P. and others
R K Dalmia vs Delhi Administration
Salib @ Shalu @ Salim vs. State of U.P. and others
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Sudhir Shantilal Mehta Vs. CBI
Vijay Kumar Ghai and others vs. State of West Bengal and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.