Back
DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Nikki Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction to safeguard against abuse in judicial proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. importance of maintaining judicial integrity and addressing false accusations. (Para 5 , 19) |
| 3. final ruling emphasizes protection of due process and falsity of allegations. (Para 24 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
(Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) :
1. Heard Sri Shailesh Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Gyan Prakash learned Additional Solicitgor General of India, assisted by Sri Sri Sanjay Yadav, learned counsel for the C.B.I. learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Bhupendra Pandey, opposite party no.2-Advocate in person
2. By means of the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant-informant namely, Nikki Devi has sought direction upon the learned Special Court SC/ST Act, Prayagraj, District Prayagraj, to consider and decide the trial of Sessions Trial No. 560 of 2021 (State Vs. Bhupendra Pandey) arising out of Case Crime No. 150 of 2021 under Sections 3 76 -D, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3 (2) (v) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Daraganj, District Prayagraj, as expeditiously as possible.
3. The instant case has remained pending since 2022. When the matter came up for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
