Back
SHEKHAR B. SARAF
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Harish Chandra India Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
1. This is an application under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) preferred against the order dated August 1, 2012 passed by the District Judge, Agra.
FACTS
2. I have laid down the factual matrix of the instant lis below:
b. Disputes and differences arose between the parties in relation to the aforesaid agreement which were referred to arbitration. The Arbitrator gave an award of Rs. 67,42,240/-in favour of the Respondent on July 19, 2009. If the award remained unpaid beyond four months from the date of delivery of the award, the same was to carry simple interest @ 16% from the date of award to the date of actual payment.
c. On May 17, 2010, the Appellants filed an application under Section 34 of the Act challenging the aforesaid award dated July 19, 2009 along with an applicati
The limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is strict and cannot be extended beyond 120 days, emphasizing the need for time....
The court established that delays in appeals under the Arbitration Act are to be strictly limited, with condonation only in exceptional circumstances where compelling reasons are provided.
The court established that appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act must be filed within 60 days, with a grace period of 30 days, and that delays beyond this period are not to....
Timely filing of appeals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is crucial; bureaucratic delays are inadequate reasons for condoning significant delays.
Delay beyond 120 days (90+30) in Section 34 petitions or corresponding appeals under Section 37 of Arbitration Act not condonable via Limitation Act Section 5; negligence, inaction, lack of bonafides....
The court emphasized that appeals under the Arbitration Act must adhere to strict timelines, and administrative delays do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
The court reinforced that strict compliance with limitation periods under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is mandatory, and delays beyond the prescribed time cannot be condoned without adequate ....
Delay in filing an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can only be condoned in exceptional cases where the party has acted bona fide and not negligently.
The court emphasized that delay in filing appeals under the Arbitration Act must be justified by sufficient cause, with negligence being insufficient for condonation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
