ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Mohd. Mohsin – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta, J.
1. Heard Sri Amit Daga, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Priyansh Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Surya Pratap Singh Parmar, learned counsel appearing for opposite party No.2 and Sri Prem Prakash Tiwari, learned AGA for the State.
2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the Criminal Complaint dated 14.1.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No.61 of 2019 (Nurul Bashar vs. Mohd.Mohsin) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station-Bhadohi, District-Bhadohi, pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi at Gyanpur.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the firm M/s Evergreen Carpets is a registered proprietorship firm and is involved in the manufacturing, export and sale of carpets. The applicant herein is the proprietor of the firm M/s Universal Carpets and used to purchase the carpets from the M/s Evergreen Carpets. The firm M/s Evergreen Carpets and the firm M/s Universal Carpets, both are the sole proprietorship firms. In connection with the aforesaid business transaction between them the firm M/s Universal Carpets has purchased
Modi Cements Ltd. V. Kuchil Kumar Nandi (1998) 3 SCC 249
Raj Kumar Khurana vs. State of (NCT of Delhi) and another
Subodh S. Salaskar vs. Jayprakash M. Shah and another
A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra and another
Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corpn. Ltd.
K.K. Sidharthan Vs. T.P. Praveena Chandran and another (1996) 6 SCC 369
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.