RAHUL CHATURVEDI, NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Informant/Victim – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Sri Kripa Kant Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and Learned AGA for the State.
2. The instant appeal is under Section 14(A)(1) of the SC/ST Act 1989 read with Section 372 Cr.P.C. spear headed against Judgement and Order of acquittal dated 08.02.2024 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, SC/ST Act, Court No.14, Prayagraj, whereby learned Sessions Judge while deciding SST No. 15(706) of 2020 (State Vs. Madan Yadav) arising out of Case Crime No. 1008 of 2019 under Section 323, 504, 506 and 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Colonelganj, District Prayagraj have convicted Madan Yadav only under Section 323 IPC and awarding six months S.I. and Rs. 1000/-fine only acquitting him from all the serious charges under Section 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.
3. Aggrieved by the aforesaid Judgement and Order the prosecutrix/victim of Case Crime No. 1008 of 2019 is proposing to invoke the powers of this Court under Section 372 Cr.P.C. read with Section 14(A)(1) of SC/ST Act, with the following prayer:-
Anurag Soni Vs. State of Chhatisgarh reported in AIR 2019 SC 1857
Dr. Dhruvram Murlidhar Sonar Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2019(18) SCC 191
Maheshwar Tigga Vs. State of Jharkhand reported in 2020 (10) SCC 108
Bannareddy and Others vs. State of Karnataka and others
Jayamma vs. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.