SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 911

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Surjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Siddharth Khare.
For the Respondents: Archana Singh, C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

(Piyush Agrawal, J.) :

1. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. By means of this writ petition, the following prayer has been made:-

    “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and quash the orders dated 14.09.2022 passed by District Basic Education Officer, District Badaun (Annexure No. 15) in interest of justice.

(ii) Issue a suitable order or direction in nature of mandamus and directing to respondents to allow to petitioner for work of the post of Assistant Teacher and pay salary month to month from due date without any interruption in interest of justice according to law.

(iii) …………….”

3. Brief facts of the case are that the State Government invited application for filling up 69,000/-post of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools by publishing advertisement. In pursuance thereof, the petitioner, having requisite qualification, applied for the same. In the said application, he has specifically mentioned the obtained number in academic and training alongwith High School Marks as 324/600. Thereafter, the petitioner appeared in the written examination held on 06.01.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top