SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Saral Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2, and Sri Arun Kumar learned counsel for respondent no.3.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:-
(b). a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to function as an Assistant Teacher in a Junior Basic School under the respondents and to pay the petitioner his regular monthly salary on the said post regularly every month;
(c). any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case;
(d). award cost of the petition to be paid to the petitioner."
3. The petitioner has appeared in the selection of Assistant Teacher
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.