IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
C/M Ram Dularey Lal Yadav Higher Secondary School and Another – Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 2553 of 2024
Decided On : 23-05-2024
NATURAL JUSTICE - SOCIETY REGISTRATION - Section 3-A, Section 4 of the Society Registration Act, 1860 - The court emphasized the necessity of affording a fair opportunity of hearing to all parties involved in administrative decisions, particularly in cases with civil consequences. It interpreted the provisions of the Society Registration Act, 1860, highlighting the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and the principles of natural justice, which were not followed in the impugned order, leading to the court's decision to quash it.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the Deputy Registrar's order denying the renewal of the society's registration certificate, claiming that the order was passed without proper hearing and based on fraudulent claims by an opposing party who was not a legitimate member of the society.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Deputy Registrar failed to provide a fair opportunity for the petitioners to present their case, violating principles of natural justice. The court noted that the proceedings were improperly handled, and the petitioners were not allowed to submit original records, which were crucial for their defense.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Registrar's order was valid given the lack of opportunity for the petitioners to be heard and the legitimacy of the opposing party's claims to membership in the society.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that the principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard (audi alteram partem), are fundamental in administrative proceedings. The absence of a fair hearing rendered the Deputy Registrar's decision unlawful.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remanded back to the Deputy Registrar for a fresh hearing with all stakeholders involved.
JUDGMENT :
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Dileep Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Piyush Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Suresh Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no. 4 and perused the material placed on record.
2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 12th December 2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Society and Chits, Lucknow Region Lucknow. Further, a writ in the nature of mandamus is also sought for commanding the respondent to accept the original papers of the petitioner's Committee of Management, for renewal of the registration certificate of the society.
3. Factual matrix of the case is that Sri Ram Dularey Lal Yadav, Higher Secondary School Society (hereinafter referred to as 'society') was got registered in the year 1966. The society has its own by-laws for functioning and managing the affairs of the society, as such the rules and regulation of the Society Registration Act, 1860 (hereinafter referred as 'Act, 1860') are fully applicable on the petitioner's society. As per the by-laws of the society, the term of Committee of Management is three years and it is said that the election of the Committee of Management is regularly held and the list of office bearers of the society including the list of member of the general body was also sent time to time by the Manager of the society.
4. The election of Committee of Management were held in year 2006, 2009 and 2010 and the requisite records/documents were also sent before the Deputy Registrar, in accordance with the provision of Section 4 of the Act, 1860.
5. It is said that in the election held on 20th December 2009, late Laxman Singh Yadav was elected as President of Committee of Management and Bahadur Singh Chandel was the Manager. On, 30 March 2010, Laxman Singh Yadav died, thereafter, Committee of Management, wrote resolution dated 11th May 2010 and proposed the election of President, wherein, Veer Singh Chandel was proposed to be the President and when Raj Bahadur Singh, the then Manager of Committee of Management died on 23rd October 2012, on 16th December 2022, the petitioner no. 2, namely, Veer Singh Chandel was elected as Manager and all the proceedings were submitted, consequently, on 27th December 2022. The petitioner applied for renewal of the registration of society which was renewed on 27th December 2012, whereafter, on 10th January 2013, opposite party no. 4, who was never inducted as a member, made false complaint before opposite party no. 2, with a prayer to deputy registrar, not to proceed on the election proceeding of the petitioners' society held on 20th December 2009 and to cancel the list of office bearers of Committee of Management of year 2012-13, the Deputy Registrar stayed the implementation of the election of Committee of Management.
6. Being aggrieved with the order dated 11th January 2023, petitioner filed writ petition no. 507 (MS) of 2013 before this Hon'ble Court and vide order dated 24th January 2013, the operation of the order dated 11th January 2013 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Society and Chits, Lucknow Region Lucknow was stayed. Whereafter, the term of the Committee of Management completed and the new election held on 10th October 2015, as per the procedure prescribed in the by-laws. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted the application on 19th March 2017 for renewal of the registration certificate before the Deputy Registrar, which was prepared on 5th July 2016. It is also submitted that the original copy of the renewal certificate is with the petition no. 2.
7. Election of the Committee of Management was consecutively held after completion of three years of the tenure i.e., on 10 October 2018, and all the papers were sent to the office of the Deputy Registrar and when on 24th October 2019, the petitioner submitted all the proceeding before the Deputy Registrar fo
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad and Others vs. B. Karunakar and Others
State Bank of India and Others vs. Rajesh Agarwal and Others
The principles of natural justice must be adhered to in administrative decisions, particularly when such decisions have civil consequences, ensuring that all affected parties are given a fair opportu....
Point of Law : Parties could not have been relegated to avail the remedy provided under Section 25 (1) of the Act. In fact, the Deputy Registrar in the order impugned was not concerned only with elec....
The Assistant Registrar lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on the validity of elections under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and any disputes must be referred to the prescribed authority under S....
Section 4-B of Act, 1860, Registrar is not supposed to make adjudication of dispute of correctness of membership like a Court but whenever a list is submitted or there is any change in the list of me....
The court affirmed that the Assistant Registrar must assess the bona fides of disputes before deciding on their referral to the Prescribed Authority under the Societies Registration Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.