SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 781

ALOK MATHUR
Prity Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Principal Judge, Court No. 2, Family Court, Lko. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anil Kumar Tiwari, Brijesh Kumar Shukla, Pradeep Kumar Rai

JUDGMENT :

Alok Mathur, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Original Suit No. 2323 of 2020 (Ankur Pandey Vs. Preeti Pandey) filed under Section 13(1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 pending before Additional Principal Judge, Court No. 2, Family Court, Lucknow.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Additional Principal Judge, Court No. 2, Family Court, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. Considering the fact that the claim petition was filed in 2020 of which proceedings are underway and from the perusal of the writ petition, there is no disclosure of any extra ordinary circumstance as to why this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the trial court to decide the same expeditiously.

6. This Court is conscious of the fact that the trial courts are burdened to heavy dockets and in a routine manne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top