SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 874

ALOK MATHUR
Ram Vishun – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Civil Judge, S. D. (Tvarita) Distt. Ambedkar Nagar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Brijesh Kumar Verma

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.

1. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Regular Suit No. 387/2006 (Sohan Vs. Ram Kishun & others), under Order 7 Rule 1 of C.P.C. for permanent injunction, pending before Addl. Civil Judge, S.D. (Tvarita), District -Ambedkar Nagar since 2006.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Addl. Civil Judge, S.D. (Tvarita), District -Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. In this regard, it is noteworthy, that this Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. Hence, the prayer is rejected.

6. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detaili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top