SHAMIM AHMED
Nirogi Venkata Sesha Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Uttar Pradesh Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed, J.
1. Shri Purnendu Chakravarty, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama alongwith short counter affidavit on behalf of opposite party No.2, which is taken on record.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed today in the Court by Shri Nadeem Murtaza, learned Counsel for the applicant is also taken on record.
3. Heard Shri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for applicant, Shri Anuuj Tondon, Advocate holding brief of Shri Purnendu Chakravarty, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A-I for the State-opposite party No.1 and perused the record.
4. The applicant, namely-Nirogi Venkata Sesha Pavan Kumar, son of Shri Nirogi Venkata Rama Krishna Rao and the opposite party No.2, namely-Hardik Kotak, son of Shri Indubhai Kantilal Kotak are present before this Court, who have been identified by their respective counsel.
5. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of the Case No.122651/2022; State vs. Petr Novotny and Ors, arising out of Case Crime No.492/2020, pending before the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom), Lucknow, under Sections 406, 420, 506, 120-B and 436 I.P.C. w
Gian Ssingh Vs. State of Punjab 2012 (10) SCC 303.
Narendra Singh And Others Vs. State of Punjab And Others 2014 (6) SCC 466.
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr
R.P. Kapoor Vs. State of Punjab
Yogendra Yadav And Others Vs. State of Jharkhand 2014 (9) SCC 653.
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.