SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. Sultanpur – Appellant
Versus
District Judge Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Vidyarthi J.
1. Heard Sri Prashant Chandra, the learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Radhika Singh Advocate, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashwani Kumar Singh Advocate, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-Steel Authority of India Ltd. has challenged the validity of an order dated 20.08.2008 passed by the District Judge, Lucknow in Execution Case No.22 of 2006, General Manager, Northern Railway versus M/s Malvika Steels and others, whereby while allowing the application (C-31) filed by the opposite party no. 2 – decree holder for impleadment of the petitioner - Steel Authority of India Ltd. as a judgment debtor, the District Judge has ordered that the petitioner-Steel Authority of India Ltd. be substituted in place of the original judgment debtor M/s Malvika Steels.
3. The petitioner has also challenged the validity of an order dated 02.01.2010 passed by the District Judge, Lucknow in the aforesaid execution case whereby the application (C-36) filed by the petitioner for recall of the aforesaid ex-parte ord
Southern Power Distribution Co. of Telangana Ltd. v. Gopal Agarwal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.