SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 774

J. J. MUNIR
Dhananjay Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Awadh Behari Singh.

JUDGMENT :

J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Commissioner, Rural Development, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, rejecting the petitioners' claim for the provision of pension contribution and leave encashment contribution in order to enable the said petitioners to claim retirement pension and leave encashment.

2. Heard Mr. K.D. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Monika Arya, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

3. The first petitioner, Dhananjay Mishra and the second petitioner, Ramesh Chandra Rai, are the two petitioners, who have instituted this writ petition. The facts of their cases are different and this Court would, therefore, venture to set them out separately, at least so far as these are different.

Facts relating the first petitioner Dhananjay Mishra's case

4. Dhananjay Mishra, petitioner No. 1, was initially appointed a Junior Clerk on 12.02.1980 with a Soil Conservation Project in District Gorakhpur, called the Gandak Project. He was transferred and posted to District Deoria under the same project. By an order dated 31.10.1988 passed by the Deputy Director, Gandak Project

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top