Back
SUNEET KUMAR, RAJENDRA KUMAR-IV
Wajahat Husain Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri J.H. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Satyavarath Sahai, Advocate holding brief of Shri S.D. Kautilya, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Prayagraj.
2. Writ Petition No. 21835 of 2010, has been filed by petitioner Wajahat Husain Khan and his wife in the year 2010, inter alia seeking following reliefs :
(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of
The court established that rights to freehold land can be claimed based on prior applications and established legal precedents, regardless of subsequent legislative changes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of freehold rights must be based on factual correctness and adherence to the legal provisions, especially in the context of land dis....
The entitlement to proprietary rights under the J&K Migrant Immovable Property Act, 1997 and the issuance of a writ of mandamus to enforce such rights.
The court established that land once acquired vests with the State, and claims of non-possession or non-payment do not negate the validity of the acquisition.
Point of law: It is settled law that mutation proceedings are summary in nature and if an order is passed in such proceedings or any writ petition thereafter challenging such orders passed in mutatio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
