Kunal Shah vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1979

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1979

NEERAJ TIWARI
Kunal Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Rizwan Ahamad, Rajrshi Gupta.
For the Respondents: Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sanjay Mishra.

JUDGMENT :

Neeraj Tiwari, J.

Civil Misc. Amendment Application No. 7 of 2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that during the pendency of application, trial Court has renumbered the Complaint Case No. 171 of 2017 (Jai Kumar Harijan v. Kunal Shah and others) as Sessions Case No. 1506 of 2023 (State of U.P. v. Kunal Shah and others), therefore, he may be permitted to carry out necessary amendment in the prayer clause and further requested that same may be allowed, for which Sri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has no objection.

3. Amendment Application is allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to carry out necessary amendment during the course of day.

Order on the memo of application

Heard Sri Rajrshi Gupta, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and Sri Awadesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

2. Present application has been filed for quashing of the summoning order dated 18.5.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 171 of 2017 (Jai Kumar Harijan v. Kunal Shah and others) renumbered as Sessions Case No. 1506 of 2023 (State of U.